Wednesday, 30 December 2015
Second article accepted!!
The editors of Ecology and Society have accepted the manuscript, composed by Jan van Tatenhove and me, entitled "Hydraulic engineering in the social-ecological delta: understanding the interplay between social, ecological and technological systems in the Dutch delta by means of 'delta trajectories'" for publication! I expect that it will be published next month.
Wednesday, 23 September 2015
Light at the end of the tunnel?
While I'm struggling turning my thoughts into a written Phd I gave a lecture to first year master students last week about the approaches used in my PhD. Lovely enthusiastic and critical audience, great fun!
Prezi here
Prezi here
Friday, 4 September 2015
Stockholm & water
For the last two weeks I’ve been in Stockholm, attending the Stockholm World Water Week (SWWW), followed by a research visit hosted by the Stockholm Environmental Institute (SEI). Both ‘events’ were a great opportunity to talk with many people about the topics I work and discuss about the particularities of the deltas where the research takes place.
At the SWWW, still, it is not easy to get immediately in touch with people working on or interested in similar topics – the seize of the conference (over 3000 people participated) and the broadness of the theme (water and development) made it very likely that you would connect with people working on totally different dimensions of water. It required some targeted, on-site researching and contacting.
So, I was happy that the week after the event was dedicated to planned and more focused discussions with ‘matching’ organizations and individuals when it comes to research topics. Besides SEI you can think about organizations such as the Global Water Partnership, the Stockholm Resilience Centre, and the Stockholm International Water Institute.
Today I gave a presentation at SEI about controlled flooding in deltas and discussed with the participants about how to conceptualize deltas, and how controlled flooding (and associated sedimentation processes) might contribute to building long term delta resilience – not only for humans inhabiting the delta, but also for the delta as a dynamic ecosystem itself. You can find the slides of the presentation via Slideshare. The conclusion was that the paper, written by Jan and me, which includes all these kinds of issues, will find a large community interested to read it and to continue thinking about dealing with delta flood dynamics ;p!
Monday, 31 August 2015
The Delta Works of the 19th century
After fifteen years I re-visited a pumping station
near some of the deepest regions (located several meters below mean sea level)
of the Netherlands, which houses one of the world’s oldest museums dedicated to
hydraulic engineering: the Cruquius. The pumping station contributed to
draining the former Haarlemmermeer (‘meer’ meaning ‘lake’) between 1849 and
1852. After serving as a backup station it was formally taken out of service in
1932 and turned into a museum two years later. It now displays several
hydraulic pumps used in other projects, but most attention goes to the eight enormous
lift pumps and the central cylinder engine, which can still move - on
electricity, and no longer pump water.
The museum, which is housed in the pumping station’s
workshops, sends out message rests on emphasizing a continuous battle between
the Dutch and their ‘water wolf’. For example, it depicts a heroic Dutch lion
in the shape of the landscape of west Holland after the reclaiming the lake. The
names of the three pumping stations are after three hydraulic engineers who
brought forward plans for reclaiming the Haarlemmermeer: Jan Adriaanszoon
Leeghwater (plans dating back to the mid-17th century), Nicolaas
Kruik (Latinised name Cruquius, early 18th century), Frans van
Lynden van Hemmen (early 19th century) which also indicates a form
of ‘heroism’.
Before the pumping stations were constructed, water
management in polders and reclamation of small wetlands was mostly done by
using wind mills, (Archimedes’) screw pumps and water wheels, but in the late
18th century, steam driven engines step by step became employed in
hydraulic engineering works. The construction of three large pumping stations to
drain the Haarlemmermeer represented a solid establishment of using steam power
for land reclamation.
The Haarlemmermeer measured around 17,000 hectares,
which more than out-doubled the largest drainage project done so far by means
of wind mills (Beemster polder of around 7,000 hectares). Over the centuries
the lake had expanded gradually (eroding its shores, breaking connections to
nearby other lakes, as well as deepening up to 4 meters due to underwater peat
extraction). Although plans for draining the lake existed earlier, it necessitated
socio-political reasons, as well as the advent of hard wind and steam power
engines, to materialize. According to the museum, William the First (the first
king of the Netherlands) needed to improve his public image after Belgium
declared its independence from Holland in 1830. Also major storms in the 1830s,
extending the lake further, threatening the urbanizing cities along its edges. Reclaiming
the Haarlemmermeer could from this perspective be seen as a nation (re-)building
effort, attempted with steam engines in pumping stations displaying grandeur and
technological achievement.
Because besides its hydraulic background, a striking
feature of the pumping station is its architecture. When looking at the
station’s pictures, but even more when visiting its interior, it is hard not to
associate the structure to designs of churches or castles. Its buttresses,
lancet-shaped windows, battlements and keep support an authoritative
affirmation by the church and state power with the practice of ‘pumping out
water’. Therefore, well worth to pay it a visit and to learn more about this
feature of water management in the Dutch delta.
Photo Gallery by QuickGallery.com
Photo Gallery by QuickGallery.com
Wednesday, 8 July 2015
Summer holiday reading material
Earlier this years I was finally introduced to the work of Amitav Ghosh through reading his great book "the Hungry Tide" about live in the chars of the Bay of Bengal.
During my summer holidays I read the wonderful book "The Glass Palace" by Amitav Ghosh. The book is an absolute page turner about the lives of three generations during the colonial times in Burma, India and Malaya. Best historic novel I've read since David Mitchells "The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet".
Before my holidays I read Flanagan's Man Booker prize winning "Narrow Road to the Deep North" about the experiences of Australian soldiers on construction sites of the infamous death railway. Both books opened my eyes to histories that I know very little of. Looking back on these two historical novels i was struck by the stylistic differences between the two, especially the ways and tone in which they describe the violent histories, but i could quite grasp what this difference was. Reading Ghosh's blog this morning I found this piece on Ghosh' blog that provides part of the answer.
Next up: the Ibis Trilogy!
During my summer holidays I read the wonderful book "The Glass Palace" by Amitav Ghosh. The book is an absolute page turner about the lives of three generations during the colonial times in Burma, India and Malaya. Best historic novel I've read since David Mitchells "The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet".
Before my holidays I read Flanagan's Man Booker prize winning "Narrow Road to the Deep North" about the experiences of Australian soldiers on construction sites of the infamous death railway. Both books opened my eyes to histories that I know very little of. Looking back on these two historical novels i was struck by the stylistic differences between the two, especially the ways and tone in which they describe the violent histories, but i could quite grasp what this difference was. Reading Ghosh's blog this morning I found this piece on Ghosh' blog that provides part of the answer.
Next up: the Ibis Trilogy!
Wednesday, 6 May 2015
Second paper submitted: deltas as co-evolving social, ecological and technological systems
Last week I submitted my second paper to Ecology and Society. For those interested, here you’ll find a short version of the paper (or, extended version of the abstract ;p).
In its academic publications, Ecology and Society emphasizes the interplay between society and ecological systems. Since 2003 the journal has focussed on topics related to the management of ecosystems, of societal processes in relation to ecological processes, and on different modes of governance or politics involved with nature. Concepts such as resilience and adaptability originate in this field, trying to express states or capacities of complex and coupled socio-ecological systems.
What I found most interesting about the journal, and which is also highlighted in my paper, is the interplay between ecology and society. In my view this materializes in the form of technology or engineering, as a ‘mediating’ object. Remarkably, studies that explicitly use socio-ecological perspectives central to E&S writing (for example, some found that did so at the level of deltas: see Garschagen on the Mekong, and Pel et al on the Netherlands) often do not go into much detail about hydraulic engineering.
If we take the Netherlands as an example, we see that various types of technology have materialized, based on dynamics or processes or events in the natural system. These are constructed, some by means of ‘simple’ science and construction works, others by means of more complex models or high-tech engineering, following from social actors’ deliberation about overall policy and individual projects. Riverembankments or smaller dams can be examples of the former, while the Oosterscheldestorm surge barrier can be an example of the latter. Once constructed these objects start to have impact on both the societal (socio-economic developments behind the dykes, feeling of being safe) and natural (changed water and sediment flows) systems.
Interestingly, this leads to responses that reinforce the existence of the structure: embankments are raised over and over again, and the negative side effects of the Oosterschelde storm surge barrier are addressed as second-order problems. This sets the delta on a certain trajectory in which technology can arguably be said to already ‘sketch’ the direction, or future, towards which the delta is evolving as a whole. Researchers have argued that these trajectories are not very sustainable, and too rigid in nature, when seen over longer timescales.
There are options to move away from existing hydraulic engineering approaches. This come often at a huge price, and also with social resistance. An example is the Room for the River programme, which is to some extent based on river widening, but where many court cases were issued by affected local communities – which is very understandable. Other areas are the domain of eco-technology, eco-engineering or ecosystem-based flood management. These need closer research, but are said to bring societal demands, natural processes and technological possibilities more in tune with each other.
In conclusion, if we talk about delta ecosystems, and societies’ ‘dealings’ with them, this interplay often materializes in physical hydraulic engineering works: embankments, barriers, dams, sluices etc. Once constructed, they yield a long-term influence on the direction in which a delta trajectory is evolving. Although difficult to move away from, unsustainable delta trajectories could be reoriented by adopting ecosystem-based forms of engineering.
Hopefully the paper will be accepted by the editors of the journal for the review process, and once that has been completed successfully, it will appear online in a few months’ time!
Tuesday, 17 March 2015
Hydraulic jungle
The Dutch version of Angkor Wat is located in the
Noordoostpolder. Overgrown, abandoned relics from a hydraulic ‘religion’ are
spread out in a deep ‘jungle’ called the ‘Waterloopbos’. It is not the first
time that this place has been mentioned (see this post about a visit of some of
my project colleagues some years back), but being an amazing sight worthwhile
to receive yet another blog and update. Even more important, the area is
targeted to receive its very own Master Plan (also check out the video)!
The forest itself dates back to 1944, and was planted in
one of the reclaimed Flevopolders. By the early 1950s the area was handed over
to the WL Hydraulics. This organization had an office in the Flevopolders and
was in need of an area to be used as a testing facility, or open air
laboratory, in which scale models of various hydraulic works could be tested on
various hydraulic characteristic. Interestingly, various decisions regarding
the place of a dyke, or layout of a harbour, have not been taken on site, but
in, or based on measurements, sometimes on the other side of the world, in a
small forest, in a typical Dutch ‘polder’.
For example, in small scale version (1:50), miniature
versions of the harbors of Rotterdam, Lagos and Bangkok appeared between the
trees, equipped with different types of docking quays and wave barriers, to
test with design and layout would suit the requirements of planned projects. Many
of the works implemented within the Delta Plan were constructed and tested
here, for example and the effect of waves and erosion during the closing of dams. After testing, however, those small scale models were just abandoned,
and became in turn the target of the forest ‘re-reclaiming’ the area with
overgrowing vegetation.
In the mid-90s WL Hydraulics moved to Delft. Plans of
the new land owner to convert the area into a recreational area with holiday
houses faced protests by nearby inhabitants and NGO’s advocating nature
protection and restoration. The NGO Natuurmonumenten was able to buy the area
in 2002, and developed various initiatives to keep the area accessible and to
capitalize on the various hydraulic scale models integrated in the forests’ walking
routes. The area is up for nomination and this will undoubtedly speed up the
formulation of a ‘Master Plan’ describing the future plans for the area.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)